Breaking free from proprietary ecosystems and embracing the future of collaborative development.
*Some licenses of Word and Excel will still be sold. But the future is open source.*
Remember when a certain perspiring CEO bounded across stages like an overexcited orangutan at a techno festival, chanting "developers" while his shirt darkened with enthusiasm? Yes, those were the days when big tech convinced us that closed ecosystems were the only path to innovation.
How utterly, brilliantly wrong we were.
"For years, we've been told that professional development means commitment to proprietary ecosystems. We've watched as our creativity became increasingly constrained by licensing agreements and walled gardens."
Yet as we enter 2025, the landscape has fundamentally shifted. Developers are no longer choosing sides based on which tech giant offers the most compelling ecosystem. Instead, they're rallying around open standards, transparent governance, and collaborative development models that prioritize innovation over lock-in.
Ah, the Microsoft fanboy. A curious specimen in the developer ecosystem. They can be spotted in the wild by their reflexive defense of monopolistic practices, their well-worn "but everyone uses it" argument, and their impressive ability to forget decades of anti-competitive behavior.
"Linux is a cancer that attaches itself in an intellectual property sense to everything it touches."
— Steve Ballmer, Former Microsoft CEO, 2001
This wasn't a slip of the tongue. This was the calculated strategy of a company terrified that open collaboration would threaten their stranglehold on the software industry. Ballmer later tried to walk back these comments when Microsoft realized they couldn't beat open source and needed to begrudgingly embrace it.
The greatest trick Microsoft ever pulled was convincing developers they'd changed their spots. The "Microsoft ❤️ Linux" campaign began only after they realized they couldn't defeat the open source movement. This wasn't an ideological conversion—it was a tactical retreat.
Meanwhile, they continued to lock users into proprietary ecosystems, push subscription models that remove ownership, and acquire open projects to bring them under corporate control. GitHub, npm, LinkedIn: all once-independent platforms now feeding data and developer mindshare into the Microsoft ecosystem.
The most committed Microsoft fanboys have developed a curious form of selective amnesia. They've forgotten the vendor lock-in, the exorbitant licensing costs, the security nightmares, the forced upgrades, and the stagnant innovation that characterized decades of Microsoft dominance.
But the internet never forgets. And as we push further into the world of open collaboration, these historical facts become ever more important to remember.
"The next generation of development isn't about which tech giant you've sworn fealty to – it's about which communities you contribute to."
For decades, we've been trapped in a cycle of dependency like addicts queuing up for our next fix of proprietary software. "Yes, I'll pay for another license. Yes, I'll accept these terms and conditions without reading them. Yes, I'll upgrade to the newest version that somehow runs slower on faster hardware."
It's been like watching a peculiarly British form of technological Stockholm Syndrome. We've developed an affection for our captors, defending them at developer conferences with the fervor of a man protecting his last Jaffa Cake.
"But what about compatibility?" you ask, clutching your Microsoft certification like it's the last lifeboat on the Titanic.
Oh, my sweet summer intern.
The compatibility argument has been the trump card of proprietary software vendors for decades. But as web standards, container technologies, and open file formats have matured, this argument holds less water than a colander in a hurricane.
Let's reminisce about that delightful moment in history when open source was declared "a cancer" by the very same dancing executive. A cancer! Not a mild irritation or competitive challenge – but a malignant disease.
In the intervening years, has open source destroyed the software industry? Has it brought civilization to its knees? Has it prevented developers from earning a living?
*Checks notes*
Well, no. Actually, quite the opposite. Open source now powers most of the internet, the world's most valuable companies build on open source foundations, and developers who understand open technologies are among the most highly compensated in the industry.
Funny how that "cancer" turned out to be more like a vitamin supplement.
The tribal chief has no clothes. We don't need tribal chiefs anymore. We don't need to pledge allegiance to corporate overlords who lock away innovation behind paywalls and NDAs.
For too long, big tech has convinced us that innovation requires massive R&D budgets, secretive development processes, and expensive licenses. They've locked innovation in a tower and charged us admission to glimpse it from afar.
But look around. Where is the most exciting innovation happening today?
The most advanced AI research is now open source, with models like PyTorch and TensorFlow leading the charge, while proprietary AI systems struggle with transparency issues.
Kubernetes, Docker, and the CNCF ecosystem have revolutionized deployment, making proprietary hosting solutions look clunky and outdated.
The explosion of open source developer tools has created workflows that proprietary vendors can only dream of integrating so seamlessly.
The pace of innovation in open source communities makes proprietary development look like it's running in treacle. When thousands of passionate developers can collaborate without artificial constraints, magic happens.
So where do we go from here? As we move deeper into 2025 and beyond, the deswindonization of the development landscape will continue apace.
Expect to see:
Software licensing will transform from a profit center to a support model, with companies competing on service quality rather than access restriction.
Companies will be judged by their contributions to, not extractions from, the open source ecosystem. The era of taking without giving back is ending.
Developers will reclaim ownership of their tools, workflows, and futures, with community-governed projects providing the foundations for a more collaborative industry.
The era of the dancing monkey is over. The age of the collaborative developer has begun.
Will there be challenges? Of course. Sustainable funding for open source remains complex. Governance models continue to evolve. But these growing pains pale in comparison to the alternative: being perpetually beholden to quarterly profit targets and shareholder whims.
Imagine a world where the foundational technology that powers our societies isn't owned by corporations or walled behind patents and NDAs. A world where a single, unified codebase serves as the digital commons for all of humanity.
In 2025, we're witnessing the first steps toward what many are calling the "Global Digital Commons" - a unified codebase that belongs to everyone and no one, maintained by a global community of contributors from every corner of the world.
This isn't just about software development; it's about rewriting the relationship between citizens and technology.
No more technological imperialism where nations rely on foreign corporations for critical infrastructure. Every country, from global superpowers to developing nations, shares ownership of the same digital foundation.
When the code that governs our digital lives is open for all to inspect, hiding surveillance mechanisms, backdoors, or exploitative practices becomes impossible. Citizens can directly verify what their technology is doing.
Technology becomes a right, not a privilege. Every citizen gains access to the same powerful tools regardless of economic circumstance, eliminating the digital divide at its source.
When billions of minds can contribute to, customize, and extend the same foundation, the pace of innovation accelerates exponentially. Allowing for a new renaissance of creativity and problem-solving.
The unified codebase is not just a technical achievement; it's a new social contract. A promise that technology will serve humanity, not the other way around.
The General Bots open-source stack delivers everything Big Tech solutions offer—without the vendor lock-in, surveillance, or predatory pricing. With 90%+ cost savings and complete control over your infrastructure, the choice is clear.
Ready to escape Big Tech's walled garden? Our team can help you plan and execute a seamless migration to open-source alternatives.
Costs are estimated by LLM and may vary based on your specific use case.
General Bots® LLM and custom AI models.
Rio de Janeiro - São Paulo - Paraná
Brazil
+55 21 4040-2160